Choice of the correct size of endotracheal tube in pediatric patients
- Author:
Seyeon PARK
1
;
Sang-Wook SHIN
;
Hye-Jin KIM
;
Gyeong-Jo BYEON
;
Ji-Uk YOON
;
Eun-Jung KIM
;
Hee Young KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- From:Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2022;17(4):352-360
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Selection and insertion of an endotracheal tube (ETT) of appropriate size for airway management during general anesthesia in pediatric patients is very important. A very small ETT increases the risk of inadequate ventilation, air leakage, and aspiration, whereas a very large ETT may cause serious complications including airway damage, post-intubation croup, and, in severe cases, subglottic stenosis. Although the pediatric larynx is conical, the narrowest part, the rima glottidis, is cylindrical in the anteroposterior dimension, regardless of development, and the cricoid ring is slightly elliptical. A cuffed ETT reduces the number of endotracheal intubation attempts, and if cuff pressure can be maintained within a safe range, the risk of airway damage may not be greater than that of an ETT without cuff. The age-based formula suggested by Cole (age/4 + 4) has long been used to select the appropriate ETT size in children. Because age-based formulas in children are not always accurate, various alternative methods for estimating the ETT size have been examined and suggested. Chest radiography, ultrasound, and a three-dimensional airway model can be used to determine the appropriate ETT size; however, there are several limitations.
