What is the difference between the tall cell variant and the classic type of papillary thyroid carcinoma on ultrasonography?
- Author:
Haejung KIM
1
;
Young Lyun OH
;
Jae Hoon CHUNG
;
Soo Yeon HAHN
;
Ko Woon PARK
;
Tae Hyuk KIM
;
Jung Hee SHIN
Author Information
- Publication Type:1
- From: Ultrasonography 2022;41(3):493-501
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:The prevalence of the tall cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (TCVPTC), which has a poor prognosis, has increased as its definition has been modified. We sought to investigate whether TCVPTC is different from the classic type on ultrasonography (US).
Methods:This study included 46 consecutive TCVPTC patients and 92 classic papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients who were confirmed surgically at the authors’ institution. The US findings and pathologic reports of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. US features based on the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System, preoperative US suspicion for lymph node metastasis, and the presence of capsular location were evaluated.
Results:Univariable and multivariable analyses identified that TCVPTC showed more frequent irregular tumor margin (odds ratio [OR], 6.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 30.09; P=0.014) and capsular location (OR, 4.63; 95% CI, 1.49 to 14.41; P=0.008) than classic PTC. Capsular location was an independent predictor of TCVPTC for tumors less than or equal to 1.5 cm in size (OR, 4.23; 95% CI, 1.12 to 15.92; P=0.033). Irregular margin was an independent predictor of TCVPTC for tumors larger than 1.5 cm (OR, 10.46; 95% CI, 1.16 to 94.48; P=0.037). Extrathyroidal extension was not significantly different between the two groups.
Conclusion:The two key features of TCVPTC on US are frequent capsular location for tumors less than or equal to 1.5 cm in size and the higher likelihood of an irregular margin for tumors larger than 1.5 cm.
