Establishment and evaluation of liver fibrosis diagnosis model based on MRI and serological markers
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20201224-01737
- VernacularTitle:基于磁共振和血清学指标的肝纤维化诊断模型的建立与评估
- Author:
Xinguang ZHAO
1
;
Hui GUAN
;
Qian MA
;
Hongfeng ZHANG
;
Hong MIAO
Author Information
1. 抚顺市中心医院磁共振科，抚顺 113006
- Keywords:
Hepatitis B;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Liver fibrosis;
Logistic models
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2022;24(1):79-83,89
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To detect the level of serological indexes in patients with chronic hepatitis B and carry out magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination at the same time, so as to construct a diagnostic model for liver fibrosis and evaluate its diagnostic value.Methods:A total of 267 patients with chronic hepatitis B in Fushun Central Hospital from January 2018 to June 2020 were selected as the research objects. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured by introvoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging, and the related serological indexes were detected; Pearson method was used to analyze the correlation among Frons index, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on the 4 factor (Fib-4), red blood cell volume distribution width to platelet ratio (RPR) and ADC; Logistic regression analysis was used to establish a new diagnosis model of hepatic fibrosis; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic value of liver fibrosis model.Results:The pathological examination of 267 patients with chronic hepatitis B showed that there were 35 cases in F0 stage, 47 cases in F1 stage, 58 cases in F2 stage, 66 cases in F3 stage and 61 cases in F4 stage. There were significant differences in platelet (PLT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), prothrombin activity (PTA), collagen Ⅳ (CⅣ), laminin (LN), hyaluronic acid (HA), precollagen Ⅲ (PCⅢ), Frons index, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on the 4 factor(Fib-4), red blood cell volume distribution width to platelet ratio (RPR) and ADC in patients with mild liver fibrosis (F0-F1), moderate liver fibrosis (F2-F3) and severe liver fibrosis (F4) ( P<0.05). Pearson analysis showed that Frons index, APRI, Fib-4, RPR and ADC were positively correlated ( P<0.05). The comparison of value of logistic probability risk estimating (PRE) and Frons index, APRI, Fib-4, RPR in the diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B liver fibrosis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of Frons index, Fib-4 and APRI in the diagnosis of moderate liver fibrosis were higher than that of mild and severe liver fibrosis, with AUC of 0.903, 0.928 and 0.957, respectively; the AUC of RPR in the diagnosis of mild and moderate hepatic fibrosis was higher (0.861); the AUC of PRE in the diagnosis of mild, moderate and severe liver fibrosis was 0.860, 0.861 and 0.865, respectively; the sensitivity was 64.6%, 76.6%, 73.8%, and the specificity was 96.3%, 89.5% and 95.1%, respectively. Conclusions:Frons index, APRI, Fib-4, RPR and PRE liver fibrosis diagnostic models have certain diagnostic value. Among them, the liver fibrosis diagnostic model predicted by MRI and serological indexes has the best comprehensive efficiency. The best diagnostic scheme should be selected according to the actual situation.
