Comparison of the Modified Bröstrom Repair Technique with and without Augmentation Using Suture Tape for Chronic Ankle Instability
10.14193/jkfas.2022.26.1.40
- Author:
Heui-Chul GWAK
1
;
Soo-Hwan JUNG
;
Jung-Han KIM
;
Dae-Hyun PARK
;
Hye-Jung CHOO
;
Dae-Yoo KIM
Author Information
1. Departments of Orthopedic Surgery , Busan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan, Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society
2022;26(1):40-47
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:The modified Broström repair (BR) technique has yielded good outcomes in patients with chronic ankle instability. This study compared clinical and radiological outcomes between two groups of patients who underwent modified BR or lateral ligament augmentation using suture tapes (ST).
Materials and Methods:Seventy-seven patients (ST group [n=47], BR group [n=30]; body mass index <26.61 kg/m2 ; mean age, 30.7±11.0 years [range, 17~39 years]; mean follow-up, 34.0±12.0 months [range, 24~59 months]) were retrospectively reviewed between January 2014 and July 2017. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Sefton grading system were used for clinical assessment. The talar tilt angle and anterior talar translation were measured using the Telos stress device (Telos GmbH, Marburg, Germany) at 150 N for radiological evaluation.
Results:FAOS, AOFAS, FAAM, and VAS scores improved in both groups at final follow-up (ST, 91.1±5.2, 93±2, 88.1±4.5, 1.5±0.7 vs. BR, 91.3±5.4, 93±3, 83.3±4.8, 1.2±0.7, respectively; p=0.854, 0.971, <0.001, 0.04, respectively). According to the FAOS, mean sports activity scores for the ST and BR groups at the final follow-up were 90.3±3.2 and 76.6±4.2, respectively, reflecting superior outcomes in the ST group (p<0.001). Sefton grading revealed satisfactory functional outcomes (ST, 91.5% vs. BR, 90.0%) . There was significant improvement in the talar tilt angle and anterior talar translation in both the ST and BR groups (7.6°±1.2°, 10.5±1.8 mm vs. 4.9°±1.1°, 7.9±1.5 mm, respectively; p<0.001).
Conclusion:The ST group demonstrated comparable clinical but better improvement in mechanical stability and FAOS sports scores than the BR group.
