Clinical and histological evaluations of the effects of concentrated growth factor combined with deproteinated bovine bone mineral in site preservation
10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.06.005
- Author:
LI Xiao
1
;
WANG Lianfei
2
;
CHENG Gang
1
,
3
Author Information
1. School of Stomatology, Bengbu Medical University
2. Department of Stomatology, The First People’s Hospital of Linan District
3. Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
dental implantation;
site preservation;
bone substitute;
deproteinated bovine bone mineral;
Bio-Oss;
Bio-Gide collagen membrane;
guided bone regeneration;
concentrated growth factor;
new bone;
histomorphometry
- From:
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
2022;30(6):412-418
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the osteogenic effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) combined with deproteinated bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in site preservation using clinical and histomorphometric observations.
Methods :A total of 26 patients who needed extraction of affected teeth and received staged implantation after site preservation were selected. The patients were randomly divided into the DBBM group (Bio-Oss was implanted simultaneously after extraction) and CGF+DBBM group (CGF+Bio-Oss was implanted simultaneously after extraction), with 13 patients in each group, and both groups were covered with Bio-Gide collagen membrane. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed preoperatively and 6 months later to measure the changes in alveolar bone height and width, and the bone specimens were drilled 6 months after site preservation during implant surgery for histological analyses.
Results: CBCT showed that the height and width of alveolar bone were absorbed 6 months after site preservation in the CGF+DBBM and DBBM groups, and the reduction in alveolar ridge width in the CGF+DBBM group was statistically less than the DBBM group (P <0.05). The histomorphometry results showed that the percentage of new bone in the CGF+DBBM and DBBM groups were 35.30% ± 3.56% and 26.38% ± 5.04%, respectively, and the amount of new bone in the CGF+DBBM group was statistically higher than the DBBM group (P<0.05).
Conclusion :CGF combined with DBBM is superior to DBBM in maintaining the alveolar bone volume and shape in site preservation, which creates favorable conditions for implant restoration.
- Full text:浓缩生长因子联合脱蛋白牛骨基质位点保存效果的临床及组织学评价.pdf
