Analysis of the on-site quality inspection results of occupational medical examination institutions in Guangdong Province in 2020
10.11763/j.issn.2095-2619.2021.03.018
- Author:
Ming-hui XIAO
1
;
Ai-chu YANG
1
;
Li-hua XIA
1
;
Jia-bin CHEN
1
;
Ji-jun GUO
1
Author Information
1. Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment Guangzhou,Guangdong 510300,China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Occupational health;
Examination;
Inspection;
Quality management;
Quality control;
Quality inspection
- From:
China Occupational Medicine
2021;48(03):334-339
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the problems existing in the on-site quality inspection of occupational medical examination(OME) institutions in Guangdong Province. METHODS: A total of 96 OME institutions in Guangdong Province were selected as the research subjects using the random number table method. On-site quality inspections were carried out and the results were analyzed. RESULTS: The OME institutions participating in the on-site quality inspection in 2020 accounted for 49.0%(96/196) of total OME institutions in Guangdong Province. Among them, occupational disease prevention and control hospitals/institutions, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), public hospitals, and private hospitals accounted for 8.3%, 9.4%, 42.7% and 39.6%, respectively. They were distributed in 17 prefecture-level cities. The registered OME qualifications include dust, chemical factors, physical factors, radiological factors and other categories. Some institutions have registered two or more OME qualifications. The non-qualified rate of the on-site quality inspections in six assessment modules of the 96 OME institutions from high to low were quality management work, equipment(instruments and vehicles) allocation, quality management system, medical and health technical personnel allocation, information report, and on-site professional assessment module, with the non-qualified rate of 24.1%, 22.4%, 20.7%, 15.9%, 15.6% and 1.1% respectively(P<0.01). The problems were mostly concentrated in the CDC, public and private hospitals, and rarely in occupational disease prevention and treatment hospitals/institutes. In addition to the on-site professional assessment module, a total of 696 non-qualified items were detected in the remaining five modules of the 96 OME institutions, with an average of seven items per institution. Occupational disease prevention and treatment hospitals/institutions, CDC, public hospitals, and private hospitals had an average of 2, 9, 8, 7 non-qualified items respectively. CONCLUSION: In the on-site quality assessment of OME institutions in Guangdong Province, there are relatively few problems in all aspects of occupational disease prevention and treatment hospitals/institutes. CDC has certain inadequacies. The public and private hospitals have more prominent problems in aspects of equipment(instruments and vehicles) allocation, quality management system and quality management work.
