Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of Nursing Students' Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision Making Scale
10.4040/jkan.2019.49.4.411
- Author:
Mi YU
1
;
Young EUN
;
KA WHITE
;
KyungJa KANG
Author Information
1. College of Nursing · Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
2019;49(4):411-422
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to adapt, modify, and validate the Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision-Making Scale (NASC-CDM©) for Korean nursing students.
METHODS:Participants were 183 nursing students with clinical practice experience in two nursing colleges. The construct validity and reliability of the final Korean version of the NASC-CDM© were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and testing of internal consistency reliability. For adaptation and modification, the instrument was translated from English to Korean. Expert review and a cross-sectional survey were used to test the instrument's validity.
RESULTS:The Korean version of the NASC-CDM© (KNASC-CDM) was composed of 23 items divided into four dimensions: (i) Listening fully and using resources to gather information; (ii) Using information to see the big picture; (iii) Knowing and acting; and (iv) Seeking information from clinical instructors. The instrument explained 60.1% of the total variance for self-confidence and 63.1% of the variance for anxiety; Cronbach's α was .93 for self-confidence and .95 for anxiety.
CONCLUSION:The KNASC-CDM can be used to identify anxiety and self-confidence in nursing students' clinical decision-making in Korea. However, further research should be done to test this instrument, as it is classified differently from the original NASC-CDM© version.
