Effect of tack cure time on polymerization shrinkage of dual-cure resin cement
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	 
    	10.11620/IJOB.2021.46.4.184
   		
        
        	
        	
        	
        		- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Yoorina CHOI
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Yu-Keong HEO
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Ji-Hye JUNG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Hoon-Sang CHANG
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        			
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Republic of Korea
			        		
		        		
	        		
        		 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Publication Type:Original Article
 
        	
        	
            
            
            	- From:International Journal of Oral Biology
	            		
	            		 2021;46(4):184-189
	            	
            	
 
            
            
            	- CountryRepublic of Korea
 
            
            
            	- Language:English
 
            
            
            	- 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	 When luting indirect restorations with dual-cure resin cement (DCRC), excess cement can be easily removed by performing tack cure of DCRC for a few seconds. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether different tack cure times affect polymerization shrinkage (PS) of the selected DCRC. One dual-cure resin cement (G-CEM LinkAce, GC) was used for measuring PS in light-cure (LC group), self-cure (SC group), and two tack-cure modes. In the first tack-cure subgroup, tack cure was performed for 1, 2, 3, and 5 seconds, followed by light cure after 2 minutes of remnant removal time in each case (TC-LC groups). In the other tack-cure subgroup, tack cure was performed for the same lengths of time, but followed by self-cure in each case (TC-SC groups). PS was measured by a modified bonded disc method for 1,800 seconds. One-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s post hoc test was used to determine any statistically significant differences among the test groups (α = 0.05). When the DCRC was selfcured after tack cure, PS was significantly lower than when it was only self-cured (p < 0.05); however, tack cure time did not affect PS (p > 0.05). When the DCRC was light-cured, PS was not affected by tack cure or tack cure time (p > 0.05). Therefore, tack cure within 5 seconds did not negatively affect the final PS when the DCRC was light-cured after cement remnant removal.