Diameter of ductus venous and angle between ductus venous and sagittal part of left portal vein associated with success rate of neonatal umbilical venous catheterization
10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20210420-00368
- VernacularTitle:门静脉左支矢状部与静脉导管的夹角及静脉导管直径对新生儿脐静脉置管成功率的影响
- Author:
Guanchu CHEN
1
;
Yapeng YAO
;
Bin MA
;
Wenyuan WANG
;
Tingting YIN
;
Jianming TANG
;
Hongxia GAO
Author Information
1. 甘肃省妇幼保健院新生儿科，兰州 730050
- Keywords:
Umbilical veins;
Catheters, indwelling;
Catheterization;
Central venous catheters;
Portal vein;
Infant, newborn
- From:
Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
2021;24(11):823-827
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect of the angle between sagittal part of left portal vein and ductus venous(AsLPVDV), and the diameter of ductus venous(DDV) on the success rate of umbilical venous catheterization (UVC) in neonates.Methods:This was a retrospective study including 80 neonates requireing UVC in Gansu Provincial Women and Child-care Hospital from April 2020 to January 2021. According to the results of UVC, they were grouped into the success group(successful insertion of catheter, n=76) and failure group(failed to insert, n=4), or one-time success group (successful after first insertion attempt, n=43) and non-one-time success group(successful after several attempts or failed to insert, n=37). The AsLPVDV and the DDV were measured before UVC by bedside ultrasound. For those with obstruction of catheterization were guided by pressing the abdomen in right side recumbent position under real-time ultrasound monitoring. The success rate of UVC and the differences of AsLPVDV and DDV among different groups were compared. Chi-square test, t test, or U test were adopted for the comparison among groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the AsLPVDV and the DDV in predicting the one-time success of UVC. Results:The total success rate of UVC was 95%(76/80) and the one-time success rate was 53.8%(43/80). A larger AsLPVDV and DDV were observed in the success group compared with the failure group [(142.2±8.3)° vs (133.6±3.2)°, (3.0±0.4) vs(1.8±0.4) mm, t=6.284 and 2.064, both P<0.05] as well as in one-time success group compared with the non-one-time success group [(147.5±6.2)° vs (135.2±4.7)°, (3.1±0.3) vs (2.8±0.6) mm, t=9.956 and 2.939, both P<0.05]. Area under the curve of AsLPVDV and DDV in predicting one-time success of UVC were 0.944(95% CI:0.869-0.983) and 0.811 (95% CI:0.708-0.890), respectively. The cut-off value was 140.4° for AsLPVDV and 2.9 mm for DDV, with the sensitivity of 93.0% and 90.7%, and specificity of 91.9% and 64.9%, respectively. Conclusions:The success rate of UVC is related to AsLPVDV and DDV. AsLPVDV is of high value in predicting the one-time success of UVC.
