Comparison between ropivacaine and lidocaine in prostatic peripheral nerve block anesthesia
10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20210418-00206
- VernacularTitle:罗哌卡因在前列腺周围神经阻滞麻醉中的效果和安全性
- Author:
Xuefei DING
1
;
Yuexing HAN
;
Shengming LU
;
Yang LUAN
;
Liangyong ZHU
;
Chenghao GUO
;
Tianbao HUANG
;
Haopeng CHEN
;
Zhong LIU
;
Hai ZHU
;
Zhen LIU
Author Information
1. 扬州大学附属江苏省苏北人民医院泌尿外科，扬州 225001
- Keywords:
Prostatic neoplasms;
Prostate puncture;
Narcotic drugs;
Analgesic
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2021;42(12):932-934
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
The present study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 137 patients who underwent prostate in North Jiangsu People's Hospital from June 2020 to May 2021. All patients underwent peripheral prostatic nerve block anesthesia (PPNB). The observation group received 1% ropivacaine 32 ml local, and the control group received the same dose of lidocaine. There was no significant difference in general data before puncture between the two groups ( P>0.05). All 137 cases were performed by the same surgeon. The number of puncture needles in the observation group and the control group was (20.2±2.8) and (20.2±2.9), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The visual analogue scores (VAS-1) of pain during puncture in the observation group and the control group were (2.62±0.74) and (2.48±0.79) points, respectively. The visual numeric score (VNS-1) was (3.03±0.88) points and (3.15±0.80) points, respectively, and there was no significant difference ( P>0.05). 30 min after puncture, VAS-2 was (0.48±0.53) points and (0.30±0.47) points, VNS-2 was (3.31±0.48) points and (3.55±0.71) points, respectively.The differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in overall complication rate between the two groups ( P=0.661).
