The experience of surgical treatment in T 4 stage prostate cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20210131-00059
- VernacularTitle:T 4期前列腺癌手术治疗的疗效分析
- Author:
Changcheng GUO
1
;
Bin YANG
;
Jianjun JU
;
Lin YE
;
Ji A
;
Yang YU
;
Shenghua LIU
;
Jiang GENG
;
Yang YAN
;
Bo PENG
;
Xudong YAO
Author Information
1. 同济大学附属第十人民医院泌尿外科，上海 200072
- Keywords:
Prostatic neoplasms;
Locally advanced;
Surgery;
Castration resistant prostate cancer;
Multidisciplinary
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2021;42(9):700-705
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment for patients with T 4 stage prostate cancer. Methods:The clinical data and prognosis of 18 patients with T 4 stage prostate cancer treated in Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital from July 2013 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The average age of these 18 patients was 68.3 (53-81)years. 10 patients were castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and 8 patients were hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). 10 CRPC patients were treated with surgical treatment due to bladder clot packing and/or lower urinary tract obstruction. 8 HSPC patients had severe hematuria, severe dysuria and local symptoms. The KPS scores of all patients were ≥80 points with an average score of 84 (80-90). The average QOL score of 18 patients was 28 (21-32). 2 cases in 18 patients underwent total pelvic resection for rectal invasion (one CRPC and one HSPC). 7 cases underwent radical cystoprostatectomy for ureteral invasion (5 cases of CRPC, 2 cases of HSPC), 9 cases underwent bladder preservation surgery for bladder neck invasion (4 cases of CRPC, 5 cases of HSPC), of which 4 cases of enlarged lymph node dissection were all HSPC patients. Results:All cases of T 4 stage prostate cancer patients operation were successfully completed, the average operation time was 256 (219-310)min and the median intraoperative blood loss was about 300 (250-350)ml. Four of them (3 cases of CRPC and 1 case of HSPC) received blood transfusion after operation. The average postoperative hospital stay was 21(11-37) days. All 18 cases were followed up and the median follow-up time was 23.8 months. There was no perioperative death, and no bladder-preserving patients had true urinary incontinence or bladder outlet stenosis.2 CRPC cases died 8 and 15 months after surgery respectively, 7 patients were PSA relapse treated with docetaxel or abiterone therapy, and 1 HSPC patient with rectal invasion was followed up for 58 months after total pelvic resection, the PSA level was still 0.003ng/ml, no distant metastasis was found. 8 cases of hormone-sensitive patients were treated with endocrine therapy, and PSA was less than 0.2 ng/ml. The average QOL of 18 patients 3 months after operation was 37 points (25-45), which was significantly higher than that before operation. The average maximum urine flow rate of patients with bladder preservation was 23(19-25)ml/s. Conclusions:For T 4 stage prostate cancer, surgical treatment is feasible and safe for doctors with extensive surgical experience. For CRPC patients, the surgery can significantly improve short-term symptoms and quality of life, and long-term benefits need to be further evaluated with a large sample. For HSPC patients, it can not only improve clinical symptoms and QOL of patients, but also provide long-term benefits.
