Comparison of indirect calorimetry and formula estimation of total daily energy expenditure in patients with acute pancreatitis
10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20210410-00132
- VernacularTitle:急性胰腺炎患者间接测热法和公式预估法计算每日总能量消耗的比较
- Author:
Yang YANG
1
;
Hongxia SONG
;
Lianyuan TAO
;
Tingting YANG
;
Yafeng WANG
;
Deyu LI
Author Information
1. 河南省人民医院（郑州大学人民医院）临床营养科，郑州 450003
- Keywords:
Pancreatitis;
Energy metabolism;
Indirect calorimetry;
Formula estimation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2021;27(9):676-680
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the consistency of indirect calorimetry, Harris-Benedict (H-B) formula method and rule of thumb in calculating the daily total energy expenditure (TDEE) of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP), and provide the basis for the formulation of reasonable nutritional support program.Methods:A total of 66 AP patients admitted to Henan Provincial People's Hospital from June 2020 to December 2020 were included and retrospectively analyzed, including 35 males and 31 females with an average age of 41.8 years. They were divided into mild acute pancreatitis (MAP) group ( n=20) and moderate to severe AP group ( n=46) according to severity. TDEE was calculated by indirect calorimetry, H-B formula and rule of thumb, and Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman diagram were used to analyze the correlation and consistency of the three methods, respectively. Results:There were no statistical significances in the TDEE of MAP group calculated by indirect calorimetry, H-B formula method and rule of thumb (both P>0.05). TDEE calculated by indirect calorimetry were higher than that of calculated by H-B formula and thumb method both in moderate and severe AP groups, and the difference was statistically significant (both P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that H-B formula method was positively correlated with the TDEE calculated by indirect calorimetry, and the correlation was 0.61 ( P<0.05). Bland-Altman plot analysis showed the consistence of the two methods. TDEE calculated by rule of thumb was positively correlated with that calculated by indirect calorimetry, and the correlation was 0.75 ( P<0.05). The bland-Altman plot analysis showed a good consistency between the two methods. Conclusion:For MAP patients, TDEE can be calculated by the H-B formula method and rule of thumb. In moderate and severe AP patients, TDEE should be calculated by indirect calorimetry as the basis for the formulation of nutritional support plan.
