Effect of Compression Garment Combined with Orthosis on Facial Burn Scar
10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2021.11.005
- VernacularTitle:压力面罩联合支具对烧伤后面部瘢痕的效果比较
- Author:
Chan ZHU
1
;
Lin HE
2
;
Hong-tao WANG
1
;
Wei-xia CAI
1
;
Hai-yang ZHAO
1
;
Zong-shi QI
1
;
Bo-wen ZHANG
1
;
Min LIANG
1
;
Yan-hui YANG
3
;
Jun-tao HAN
1
Author Information
1. Department of Burns and Cutaneous Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
2. Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Maxillofacial Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
3. Department of Occupation Therapy, Shaanxi Rehabilitation Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
- Publication Type:Research Article
- Keywords:
burn;
facial scar;
rehabilitation;
compression garment;
orthosis;
3D compression mask
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
2021;27(11):1266-1271
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the effects of compression garment combined with orthosis for central face on facial burn scar to compression garment and 3D compression mask. Methods:From September, 2016 to June, 2019, 38 facial burn scar patients received compression therapy in Department of Burns and Cutaneous Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University. According to their preference, they wore compression garment only (CG group, n = 15), compression garment and orthosis for central face (CO group, n = 17) and 3D compression mask (3D group, n = 6) for a year. The facial scar was assessed with Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) before and after treatment, and the comfort and medical cost was investigated with questionnaire. Results:The VSS score decreased after treatment in all the groups (F = 18.49, P < 0.05), while the VSS score was higher in CG group than in CO group (1.717 points, 95%CI 0.925 to 2.482, P < 0.001) and 3D group (1.782 points, 95%CI 0.738 to 2.827, P < 0.001), the difference was less between CO group and 3D group (0.065 points, 95%CI -0.957 to 1.088, P = 1.000). The comfort rate was 60%, 52.9% and 66.7% for CG group, CO group and 3D group, respectively, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). The medical cost was the most for 3D group (12 000 to 16 000 Yuan), and similar for CG group (3000 to 4800 Yuan) and CO group (3300 to 5300 Yuan). Conclusion:Compression garment combined with orthosis for central face is more effective on facial burn scar, similar to 3D compression mask, but cheaper than 3D mask, which can be a choice for facial scar patients in developing areas.
