- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Miae OH
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Da-Yea SONG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Guiyoung BONG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Nan-He YOON
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		So Yoon KIM
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Joo-Hyun KIM
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Jongmyeong KIM
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Hee Jeong YOO
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
 - Publication Type:Original Article
 - From:Psychiatry Investigation 2021;18(3):196-204
 - CountryRepublic of Korea
 - Language:English
 - 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	Objective:This study aimed to examine the validity of the Korean version of the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (K-ADI-R) and determine its efficacy in identifying individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). 
				        	
Methods:Data were pooled from several past and ongoing studies as well as clinical records acquired at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2008 to 2017. The K-ADI-R were administered and scored by trained research reliable examiners. Measurements to investigate the validity of the K-ADI-R was through sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and Cohen’s kappa.
Results:A total of 1,271 (age 88.9±62.42 months, male=927) participants were included. The K-ADI-R yielded strong psychometric properties with high sensitivity (86.06–99.27%), specificity (84.75–99.55%), PPV (92.33–99.72%), and NPV (79.43–98.64%). There were significant differences in item scores across the K-ADI-R diagnostic algorithm regardless of age and sex (p<0.001). Agreement between the K-ADI-R and other ASD related measurements ranged between levels of good to excellent.
Conclusion:Despite language or cultural boundaries, the K-ADI-R demonstrated high levels of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV within a wide range of participants; hence, suggesting promising usage as a valuable diagnostic instrument for individuals with ASD. 
            
