Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Rucha M. SHAH
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Jason SCHMIDT
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Elizabeth JOHN
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Sheila RASTEGARI
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Priyanka ACHARYA
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Prashant KEDIA
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
 - Publication Type:Original Article
 - From:Clinical Endoscopy 2021;54(5):739-744
 - CountryRepublic of Korea
 - Language:English
 - 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	Background/Aims:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique between 19 G and 22 G needles in patients undergoing EUS-LB. 
				        	
Methods:We performed a prospective case series study of 20 patients undergoing EUS-LB at a single center between September 2017 and April 2020. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in sample adequacy via a single actuation wet suction technique between a 19 G core needle and a 22 G core needle. Adequacy was gauged by cumulative core biopsy length and the number of portal tracts visualized.
Results:The 19 G needle provided a longer core length (2.5 cm vs. 1.2 cm, p<0.0001), more complete portal tracts (5.8 vs. 1.7, p<0.0001), more total tracts (8.8 vs. 3, p<0.0001), and a longer, intact, fragment length (0.75 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p<0.0006). The 19 G needle was superior in providing adequate (60% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and diagnostic pathologic samples (85% vs. 10%, p<0.001).
Conclusions:A single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique using a 19 G needle is superior to that using a 22 G needle for tissue acquisition and sample adequacy in EUS-LB. 
            