Feasibility of clinical performance assessment of medical students on a virtual sub-internship in the United States
- Author:
John WOLLER
1
;
Sean TACKETT
;
Ariella APFEL
;
Janet RECORD
;
Danelle CAYEA
;
Shannon WALKER
;
Amit PAHWA
Author Information
- Publication Type:Brief report
- From:Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions 2021;18(1):12-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: We aimed to determine whether it was feasible to assess medical students as they completed a virtual sub-internship. Six students (out of 31 who completed an in-person sub-internship) participated in a 2-week virtual sub-internship, caring for patients remotely. Residents and attendings assessed those 6 students in 15 domains using the same assessment measures from the in-person sub-internship. Raters marked “unable to assess” in 75/390 responses (19%) for the virtual sub-internship versus 88/3,405 (2.6%) for the in-person sub-internship (P=0.01), most frequently for the virtual sub-internship in the domains of the physical examination (21, 81%), rapport with patients (18, 69%), and compassion (11, 42%). Students received complete assessments in most areas. Scores were higher for the in-person than the virtual sub-internship (4.67 vs. 4.45, P<0.01) for students who completed both. Students uniformly rated the virtual clerkship positively. Students can be assessed in many domains in the context of a virtual sub-internship.
