Advantage of surgical intensive care unit (SICU) predominant by cardiothoracic surgeons in multiple trauma management in a primary hospital.
10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.11.004
- VernacularTitle:Advantage of surgical intensive care unit (SICU) predominant by cardiothoracic surgeons in multiple trauma management in a primary hospital
- Author:
Ya-Jun CHEN
1
;
Xin-Ling MU
1
;
Pan-Pan XIE
2
;
Hong-Kai LIAN
3
,
4
Author Information
1. Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450004, China.
2. Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Central Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450007, China.
3. Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Central Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450007, China. Electronic address: hnlianhongkaidavid@
4. com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cardiothoracic surgeon;
Damage control theory;
Limited fluid resuscitation;
Multiple trauma;
Primary hospitals;
Surgical intensive care unit
- From:
Chinese Journal of Traumatology
2021;24(1):45-47
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE:It is a challenge for the primary hospitals to manage multiple trauma patients. In this article, we explored the advantage of establishing a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) predominant by cardiothoracic surgeons in the early management of multiple trauma.
METHODS:This was a retrospective study and patients with multiple trauma in our hospital were collected and divided into two groups, based on time period and treat modes: group A (retrospective observation group) where patients were treated with the traditional treatment mode from January 2017 to December 2017 and group B (study group) where patients were treated in the SICU predominant by cardiothoracic surgeons from January 2018 to December 2018. Clinical data including demographics, injury severity score (ISS), causes of injury, time intervals from reception to entering SICU or operating room and mortality three days after injuries were collected. Data were analyzed by SPSS 20.0 software. Categorical variables were presented as number and/or frequency and continuous variables as mean ± SD.
RESULTS:Altogether 406 patients were included in this study, including 217 patients in group A and 189 patients in group B. General data between the two groups revealed no significant difference: mean age (years) (35.51 ± 12.97 vs. 33.62 ± 13.61, p = 0.631), gender distribution (mean/female, 130/87 vs. 116/73, p = 0.589) and ISS (15.92 ± 7.95 vs. 16.16 ± 6.89, p = 0.698). Fall from height were the dominant mechanism of injury, with 135 cases in group A (71.4%) and 121 cases in group B (55.8%), followed by traffic accidents. Injury mechanism showed no significant differences between two groups (p = 1.256). Introduction of the SICU significantly improved the care of trauma patients, regarding speed and mortality. Time intervals between reception and entering SICU or operating room was (108.23 ± 6.72) min and (45.67 ± 7.96) min in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.001). Mortality three days after injuries was 13.89% and 5.53% in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION:Establishing a SICU predominant by cardiothoracic surgeons can reduce the early mortality rates in multiple trauma patients.
