Clinical study of hydraulic perfusion pump and traditional water flushing for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.01.012
- Author:
Yue-Hong GUAN
1
;
Jian WU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Rehabilitation, the Second People's Hospital of Changshu, Changshu 215500, Jiangsu, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Case-control studies;
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy;
Therapeutic irrigation
- MeSH:
Diskectomy;
Diskectomy, Percutaneous;
Endoscopy;
Humans;
Infusion Pumps;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery*;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*;
Retrospective Studies;
Treatment Outcome;
Water
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2021;34(1):63-67
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical outcomes of hydraulic perfusion pump and traditional water fhushing in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.
METHODS:From January 2016 to December 2018, 72 patients with lumbar disc herniation failed to conservative treatment were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into hydraulic perfusion pump group and traditional water flushing group, 36 cases in each group. There were no significant differences in gender, age, prominent segment, clinical classification, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) score between two groups (
RESULTS:All the patients were followed up for 12 to 24 (15.7±5.1) months. Compared with the traditional water flushing group, the operation time of the hydraulic perfusion pump group was shorter [(65.5±21.3) min vs (74.8±19.9) min,
CONCLUSION:Both hydraulic perfusion pump and traditional water flushing assisted percutaneous endoscopic lumbar disc herniation can achieve satisfactory clinical results, but the former has shorter operation time, clearer intraoperative vision, less bleeding, and fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications.
