Clinical effects between cannulated screw and bone plate internal fixation for humeral tuberosity fracture:a Meta analysis.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.02.017
- Author:
Xiang WU
1
;
Fei LI
1
;
Jing YING
1
;
Bin CHEN
1
;
Yu-Xuan SU
1
;
Hai-Yu SUN
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030000 Shanxi, China.
- Publication Type:Meta-Analysis
- Keywords:
Fracture fixation, internal;
Humeral fractures;
Meta analysis
- MeSH:
Bone Plates;
Bone Screws;
Fracture Fixation, Internal;
Humans;
Humeral Fractures/surgery*;
Humerus;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2021;34(2):180-190
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare clinical effect of cannulated screw and bone plate for the treatment of humeral fracture of greater tuberosity.
METHODS:From January 2010 to January 2020, clinical trial literatures on the treatment of humeral tuberosity fractures with cannulated screw and bone plate were searched by PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, CBM Database, VIP Database and other databases. Independent literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction were performed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Revman5.2 software was used to perform Meta analysis.
RESULTS:Totally 5 clinical randomized controlled trials and 12 cohort studies were selected, including 1 068 patientsin which 559 patients were treated by cannulated screw internal fixation and 509 patients treated by bone plate internal fixation. Meta analysis resluts showed that there were satistical differences in operation time[MD=-23.03, 95% CI(-29.69, -16.36),
CONCLUSION:Compared with bone plate, cannulated screw for the treatment of humeral fracture of greater tuberosity has advantages of shorter opertaion time, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, lower incidence rate of postopertaive infection, and more benefit for fracture healing.
