Comparison of clinical efficacy of two different arthroscopic release methods for the treatment of primary frozen shoulder.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.12.004
- Author:
Hong-Yao XU
1
;
Zhi-Hong DAI
1
;
Xiang-Jie ZOU
1
;
Peng-Cheng XIA
1
;
He HUANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Sports and Joint Surgery, Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, Jiangsu, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Arthroscopes;
Frozen shoulder;
Joint capsule release;
Shoulder joint
- MeSH:
Arthroscopy;
Bursitis/surgery*;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Range of Motion, Articular;
Shoulder Joint/surgery*;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2020;33(12):1101-1105
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare clinical effects of inside-out technique and outside-in technique for the treatment of idiopathic frozen shoulder under arthroscopy.
METHODS:From April 2015 to July 2019, 65 patients with primary frozen shoulder were divided into observation group and control group according to different treatment methods. In observation group, there were 32 cases, including 14 males and 18 females, aged 48 to 64 (54.82±5.35) years old, 18 cases on the right side and 14 cases on the left side. The course of disease was 4 to 10 (7.76±1.19) months. The patients were treated with outside in technique. In control group, there were 33 cases, 16 males and 17 females, aged 45 to 62 (54.64±4.16) years old, 18 cases on the right side and 15 cases on the left side. The course of disease was 5 to 9 (7.65±1.24) months. The patients were treated with inside out technique. The operation time, hospitalization days and treatment cost were compared between the two groups. Constant-Murley function score before and after the operation andthe shoulder joint range of motion one month after operation were compared to evaluate the clinical efficacy.
RESULTS:All 65 patients were followed up for 9 to 17 months with an average follow up time of (11.34±2.24) months. Compared with control group, operation time in observation group was shorter[(55.53± 10.23) min vs (85.58±13.39) min], and functional scores of Constant-Murley after surgery were significantly changed in both groups compared with that before surgery(
CONCLUSION:The two arthroscopic release schemes have achieved satisfactory results for thetreatment of primary frozen shoulder, and the shoulder joint function and pain degree have been effectively improved. Compared with the inside-out technique, the outside in release technique is more direct, the operation is simpler and the operation time is shorter. It has certain advantages in releasing operation for primary frozen shoulder.
