CLINICAL OBSERVATION OF IMPROVING AXIAL OFFSET BY USING Ilizarov BONE TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY
10.7507/1002-1892.20160110
- Author:
Jingshuang WANG
1
Author Information
1. No. 3 Department of Orthopedics
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Axial offset;
Bone transport;
Ilizarov technique
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2016;30(5):546-550
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness of Ilizarov technique in improving bone transport axial offset. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2014, 14 patients with tibial fracture were treated by using Ilizarov technique. Of 14 cases, 11 were male and 3 were female, aged 18-70 years (mean, 38.8 years); there were 10 cases of infective bone defect and 4 cases of non-infective bone defect. According to Paley typing, 7 cases were rated as type B1(bone defect without shortening) and 7 cases as type B3(bone defect with shortening). The injury to operation time was 1 to 72 months (mean, 11.9 months). Ilizarov fixation was used for type architecture and adjusting fixed bone removal of half the distance between the needle and the ring, changing the auadrilateral edges, adjusting the convolution relationship between the bone removal section and bone segment involution, and adjusting the two force lines of bone segment involution end so as to make the limb lines of force satisfactory. RESULTS: The patients were followed up 9-31 months (mean, 19.1 months). Four cases achieved natural bone healing at last follow-up, bone healing was obtained in 10 cases after bone graft. At 1 week after operation, X-ray films showed angulation in the coronal plane in 10 cases (3-12°, 4.9° on average) and in the sagittal plane in 9 cases (2-12°, 3.8° on average); axial offset was observed in 6 cases (43%), which was corrected in 5 cases except 1 case. At last followup, angulation in the coronal plane was observed in 5 cases (2-4°, 2.6° on average), angulation in the sagittal plane in 6 cases (2-6°, 4.1° on average), and axial offset in 1 case (7%), which were significantly improved when compared with ones at 1 week. According to Paley evaluation criteria, the osseous results were excellent in 12 cases and good in 2 cases; the functional results were excellent in 12 cases and good in 2 cases at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Axial offset in the Ilizarov bone transport relatively common. By adjusting fixed bone removal of half the distance between the needle and the ring, the axial offset can be improved.
