Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance inCervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status
- Author:
Soo Young JEONG
1
;
Hyea PARK
;
Myeong Seon KIM
;
Jun Hyeok KANG
;
E Sun PAIK
;
Yoo-Young LEE
;
Tae Joong KIM
;
Jeong Won LEE
;
Byoung-Gie KIM
;
Duk Soo BAE
;
Chel Hun CHOI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment 2020;52(2):516-523
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancerthat was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognosticsignificance of LNM differs according to disease status.
Materials and Methods:Patients with FIGO stage IB or higher cervical cancer who had pretreatment computedtomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging studies as well as long-term follow-upwere enrolled in this retrospective study. The hazard ratio (HR) of Cox regression was usedto determine the prognostic significance of LNM. The HRs were compared between the differenttumor groups (based on stage, histology, tumor size, primary treatment, age, parametriuminvolvement, and lymphovascular space invasion).
Results:A total of 970 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2007 were included.The pretreatment LNM had prognostic significance in patients with stage IB1/IIA (HR forprogression-free survival 2.10, p=0.001; HR for overall survival 1.99, p=0.005). However,the significance gradually decreased or disappeared with advancing stages. Similarly, theprognostic significance of the pretreatment LNM decreased with advancing disease status,including old age, parametrial involvement or lymphovascular space involvement. In contrast,the tumor size was associated with the prognostic significance of LNM with advancingstatus. The significance of the clinical LNM did not reflect the significance of the clinicalstage. In contrast, the tumor size, parametrial involvement, and significance of the pathologicLNM reflected the clinical stage.
Conclusion:In patients with cervical cancer, pretreatment LNM on imaging has different clinical significancedepending on the tumor status.
