Differentially expressed genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma: A comprehensive analysis
10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199.2019.07.009
- VernacularTitle: 食管鳞癌和腺癌转录组差异基因综合分析
- Author:
Yu-meng LI
1
;
Jia-kang MA
1
;
Kai-kai REN
1
;
Nan LI
1
;
Jian WANG
1
;
Jin-qi SUN
2
;
Ya-li ZHANG
3
;
Jun MA
3
Author Information
1. Department of Oncology，The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450014,Henan, China; Department of Clinical Laboratory，The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450014,Henan, China
2. Department of Oncology,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450014,Henan, China
3. Department of Clinical Laboratory,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450014,Henan, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma;
esophageal adenocarcinoma;
transcriptome;
molecular characteristics;
ceRNA network;
survival analysis
- From:
Journal of Medical Postgraduates
2019;32(7):715-719
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective This study aimed to analyze the differences in the molecular characteristics of transcriptome between esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Methods We obtained transcriptomic data on ESCC and EAC from the TCGA database, screened differentially expressed mRNAs, lncRNAs and miRNAs in cancer and the adjacent tissues, and constructed a network of ESCC- and EAC-related competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA). We predicted the target genes and performed gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses on important miRNAs, and compared the molecular features of the transcriptomes between ESCC and EAC. Results The ceRNA network analysis showed that PVT1, LINC00524, miR-204, miR-383, HOXC8 and NTRK2 played important regulatory roles in both ESCC and EAC. Totally, 13 227 regulatory target genes were predicted with miR-204-5p via miRWalk and 232 target genes screened from the miRDB database. GO analysis revealed 38 enrichments, mainly involved in the regulation of cell-matrix adhesion, morphogenesis of cell membrane projection, and β-catenin combination, KEGG analysis showed 4 relevant pathways: the hedgehog, life-regulating, estrogen and relaxin signaling pathways, and survival analysis manifested LINC00261, MLIP-IT1 and LINC00504 as survival-related differentially expressed lncRNAs, hsa-mir-338 as differentially expressed miRNA, but no mRNA in ESCC. Survival-related differentially expressed lncRNAs in EAC included CYP1B1-AS1 and HOTAIR, and differentially expressed mRNAs included IL11, NTRK2, ANGPT2 and PBK. Of the differentially expressed lncRNAs in both ESCC and EAC, 150 (15.4%) were up-regulated and 158 (26.8%) down-regulated; of the miRNAs, 22 (24.2%) up-regulated and 8 (27.6%) down-regulated; and of the mRNAs, 234 (20.5%) up-regulated and 418 (23.7%) down-regulated. Conclusion There are significant molecular differences between ESCC and EAC, and the differentially expressed lncRNA, miRNA and mRNA may provide some new targets and molecular markers for the treatment and prognosis of esophageal carcinoma.
