Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in linear measurements on axial images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography.
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Nathália Cristine DA SILVA
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Maurício BARRIVIERA
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		José Luiz Cintra JUNQUEIRA
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Francine Kühl PANZARELLA
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Ricardo RAITZ
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
 - Publication Type:Original Article
 - Keywords: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Dimensional Measurement Accuracy; Reproducibility of Results
 - MeSH: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography*; Dimensional Measurement Accuracy; Nylons; Observer Variation; Reproducibility of Results
 - From:Imaging Science in Dentistry 2017;47(1):11-15
 - CountryRepublic of Korea
 - Language:English
 - Abstract: PURPOSE: This study was performed to investigate the intra- and inter-observer variability in linear measurements with axial images obtained by PreXion (PreXion Inc., San Mateo, USA) and i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Xoran Technologies Inc., Hatfield, USA) CBCT scanners, with different voxel sizes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cylindrical object made from nylon with radiopaque markers (phantom) was scanned by i-CAT and PreXion 3D devices. For each axial image, measurements were taken twice in the horizontal (distance A-B) and vertical (distance C-D) directions, randomly, with a one-week interval between measurements, by four oral radiologists with five years or more experience in the use of these measuring tools. RESULTS: All of the obtained linear measurements had lower values than those of the phantom. The statistical analysis showed high intra- and inter-observer reliability (p=0.297). Compared to the real measurements, the measurements obtained using the i-CAT device and PreXion tomography, on average, revealed absolute errors ranging from 0.22 to 0.59 mm and from 0.23 to 0.63 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that both scanners are accurate, although the linear measurements are underestimations, with no significant differences between the evaluators.
 
            