Application value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and conventional magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after TACE treatment
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2019.22.005
- VernacularTitle: 磁共振动态增强与常规扫描用于肝癌肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗效果评估价值的比较
- Author:
Jie ZHANG
1
;
Qingrong ZHANG
2
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, Pingyang Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325400, China
2. Department of Ultrasound, the Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Liver neoplasms;
Chemoembolization, therapeutic;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Dynamic enhancement;
Conventional magnetic resonance;
Quantitative parameters;
Curative effect;
Application value
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2019;26(22):2708-2711
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the application of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional MRI in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions before and after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment and evaluation of the effect of TACE treatment, thus to judge its application value, and to provide guidance for early clinical diagnosis.
Methods:Seventy-six patients with HCC who underwent TACE in Pingyang Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018 were selected in the research.According to the random number table method, 76 patients were randomly divided into control group and study group, with 38 cases in each group.The control group was examined by conventional MRI, while the study group was examined by dynamic enhancement of MRI.The lesions were observed before and after treatment, and Ktrans, Kep and ve of the two groups were recorded before and after treatment.The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the two groups were compared.
Results:Before and after treatment, the total detection rates of the study group (92.05%, 100.00%) were significantly higher than those of the control group (80.85%, 71.43%) (χ2=16.489, 15.246, all P<0.05). Before treatment, the Ktrans, Kep, ve equivalents between the two groups had no statistically significant differences (t=0.915, 0.448, 0.354, all P>0.05). After treatment, the Ktrans and Kep values of the two groups were significantly decreased, and the Ktrans[(0.419±0.101)min] and Kep[(1.073±0.237)min] values of the study group were significantly lower than those of the control group [(0.647±0.128)min, (1.158±0.221)min], the differences were statistically significant (t=9.485, 5.642, all P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in ve value between the two groups (t=1.025, P>0.05). The accuracy and sensitivity of detection in the study group (92.11%, 97.37%) were significantly higher than those in the control group (81.58%, 84.21%), and the specificity (94.74%) of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (97.37%) (χ2=17.186, 14.453, 6.489, all P<0.05).
Conclusion:Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is more effective in the detection of HCC patients before and after TACE treatment.It is convenient to provide guidance for treatment and has higher clinical application value.It is worthy of popularizing.
