Reversals in Decisions about Life-Sustaining Treatment and Associated Factors among Older Patients with Terminal Stage of Cardiopulmonary Disease
10.4040/jkan.2019.49.3.329
- Author:
Jung Ja CHOI
1
;
Su Hyun KIM
;
Shin Woo KIM
Author Information
1. College of Nursing, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. suhyun_kim@knu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Aged;
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation;
Decision Making;
Life Support Care;
Terminal Care
- MeSH:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation;
Decision Making;
Divorce;
Electronic Health Records;
Heart;
Humans;
Intubation;
Life Support Care;
Logistic Models;
Lung Diseases;
Renal Dialysis;
Retrospective Studies;
Terminal Care;
Tertiary Care Centers;
Ventilators, Mechanical
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
2019;49(3):329-339
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency, patterns, and factors of reversals in decisions about life-sustaining treatment (LST) among older patients with terminal-stage chronic cardiopulmonary disease. METHODS: This was a retrospective correlational descriptive study based on medical chart review. De-identified patient electronic medical record data were collected from 124 deceased older patients with terminal-stage cardiopulmonary disease who had made reversals of LST decisions in an academic tertiary hospital in 2015. Data were extracted about the reversed LST decisions, LST treatments applied before death, and patients' demographic and clinical factors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with the reversal to higher intensity of LST treatment. RESULTS: The use of inotropic agents was the most frequently reversed LST treatment, followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation, ventilator therapy, and hemodialysis. Inconsistency between the last LST decisions and actual treatments occurred most often in hemodialysis. One-third of the reversals in LST decisions were made toward higher intensity of LST treatment. Patients who had lung diseases (vs. heart diseases); were single, divorced, or bereaved (vs. married); and had an acquaintance as a primary decision maker (vs. the patients themselves) were significantly more likely to reverse the LST decisions to higher intensity of LST treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the complex and turmoil situation of the LST decision-making process among older patients with terminal-stage cardiopulmonary disease and suggests the importance of support for patients and families in their LST decision-making process.
