Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery Using a Joystick-Guided Endoscope Holder (Soloassist II) or a Human Assistant
- Author:
Jun Sung KIM
1
;
Won Cheol PARK
;
Joo Hyun LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Laparoscopy; Colon cancer; Soloassist; Endoscope holder
- MeSH: Colon; Colonic Neoplasms; Diet; Endoscopes; Flatulence; Humans; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Lymph Nodes; Retrospective Studies
- From:Annals of Coloproctology 2019;35(4):181-186
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colon cancer surgery in the Soloassist II-assisted (SA) group and in the human-assisted (HA) group. METHODS: A total of 76 patients with colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy and anterior resection performed by a single surgeon between January 2017 and May 2018 were recruited from the consecutively enrolled registry and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of 76 patients, 43 underwent surgery with human assistance and 33 underwent surgery using the Soloassist II system. The clinicopathologic characteristics were not statistically different between the 2 groups. In both HA and SA groups, no statistical difference was observed between operation time (220.23 ± 47.83 minutes vs. 218.03 ± 38.22 minutes, P = 0.829), total number of harvested lymph nodes (20.42 ± 10.86 vs. 20.24 ± 8.21, P = 0.938), and other parameters of short-term outcomes (length of hospital stay, blood loss, open conversion, time to flatus, time to soft diet, and complication events). Subgroup analyses did not show statistical differences. CONCLUSION: Soloassist II can reduce the participation of a human assistant during surgery and is not inferior to human assistance in laparoscopic-assisted colon cancer surgery. Thus, it is a feasible instrument in laparoscopic-assisted colon cancer surgery that can provide positive short-term outcomes.
