The dimensions and disorientation of clinical decision made in practice
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-635X.2019.03.001
- VernacularTitle:临床决策在实践中的维度与迷失
- Author:
Xiaowei JIA
1
;
Taiping ZHANG
;
Xin YE
;
Dakui LI
;
Hanzhong LI
;
Zhuming JIANG
Author Information
1. 人民卫生出版社医学学术编辑部
- Keywords:
Clinical decision-making;
Administration;
Resource allocation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition
2019;27(3):129-132
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Clinical decision-making has been perceived as a primary cognitive activity for clinicians in daily practice,which based on the process of choosing between alternatives or options for patients.A single clinical decision might affect one patient's health outcomes,while the sum of clinical decisions made by all clinicians would play a decisive role in the allocation and utilization of health resources.Several dimensions should be taken into consideration when making clinical decisions,such as scientificity,clinical experience,economical status,medical humanities and government administration.In addition,clinical decision-making behavior should be administrated and guided by government,from the following seven aspects,so as to avoid "scientism" or " commercial alienation" phenomenon:national guidelines and standards development,academic standardization,expertise offering,medical training with human factors as well as legal punishment,medical knowledge accessibility,reimbursement restriction,and application of artificial intelligence.
