Evaluation of intradermal absorbable and mattress sutures to close pilonidal sinus wounds with Limberg flap: a prospective randomized comparative study
10.4174/astr.2018.94.2.88
- Author:
Kenan ÇETIN
1
;
Hasan Ediz SIKAR
;
Aytaç Emre KOCAOĞLU
;
Muhammet Fikri KÜNDEŞ
;
Mehmet KARAHAN
;
Levent KAPTANOĞLU
Author Information
1. Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Research and Education Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey. hasan.sikar@me.com
- Publication Type:Comparative Study
- Keywords:
Pilonidal sinus;
Sutures;
Surgical flaps
- MeSH:
Anal Canal;
Anti-Bacterial Agents;
Body Mass Index;
Follow-Up Studies;
Hair Follicle;
Humans;
Methods;
Necrosis;
Pilonidal Sinus;
Prospective Studies;
Recurrence;
Return to Work;
Skin;
Smoke;
Smoking;
Surgical Flaps;
Surgical Wound Infection;
Sutures;
Wound Infection;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2018;94(2):88-93
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We aimed to compare skin closure techniques, standard (intermittent mattress) and continuous subcuticular sutures, following Limberg flap procedure. METHODS: From July 2013 to July 2015, 92 patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease were prospectively randomized into 2 groups consisting of 46 patients for both. Patients underwent sinus excision and closure with Limberg flap; continuous subcuticular suture was used in subcuticular group (SG) and intermittent mattress sutures were used in mattress group (MG) for skin closure. Characteristics of patients, features of pilonidal disease, macerations, infections, wound dehiscence, flap necrosis, operation time, time of drain removal, wound complications, early recurrences, and time till return to work were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between groups per sex, age, body mass index, smoking, number of sinuses, depth of intergluteal sulcus, distance of incision to anus, volume of extracted tissue, number of hair follicles per cm2, recurrence, operation, and mean follow-up time. Two patients showed signs of wound complications (4.4%) in SG, whereas 8 cases (17.4%) showed signs in MG (P < 0.05). One patient in SG had surgical site infection and required antibiotics (2.2%), where as there were 6 cases treated in MG (13.0%) (P < 0.05). Removal of drain tube, and time till return to work rates are lower for SG than MG (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, surgical procedures which include Limberg flap method and subcuticular closure may reduce infection and maceration rates. Future studies are needed to achieve greater detailed evaluation.
