Evaluation of a polyurethane foam dressing impregnated with 3% povidone-iodine (Betafoam) in a rat wound model
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Jin Won LEE
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Kyo Young SONG
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
 - Publication Type:Original Article
 - Keywords: Polyurethane foam; Wound healing; Povidone-iodine; In vivo
 - MeSH: Adult; Animals; Bandages; Blood Vessels; Collagen; DNA; Humans; Male; Polyurethanes; Povidone-Iodine; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Re-Epithelialization; Silver; Skin; Wound Healing; Wounds and Injuries
 - From:Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2018;94(1):1-7
 - CountryRepublic of Korea
 - Language:English
 - Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Betafoam in terms of wound healing and safety. METHODS: Fifty-four male adult Sprague-Dawley rats (weight, 200–250 g) were used in the study. Full-thickness skin defects were created on the back of each rats. The rats were assigned to 6 groups according to the type of wound dressing used (n = 9 for each group): Betafoam, Allevyn-Ag, Mepilex-Ag, Medifoam silver, Polymem-Ag, and gauze. The wound size, histological findings, and amount of DNA on the changed dressings for each group were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: All groups showed an effective decrease in wound size. However, the differences between Betafoam and the other dressings were statistically significant on day 14 (P < 0.05). The number of newly generated blood vessels in the Betafoam group was significantly higher than in the gauze, Allevyn-Ag, and Medifoam silver groups (P < 0.001). In the Betafoam group, the proportion of collagen deposition was highest and showed a significantly superior arrangement of collagen fibers compared with the gauze, Allevyn-Ag, Mepilex-Ag, and Medifoam silver groups. The total content of the remaining DNA counts of the exchanged dressings were significantly lower in the Betafoam group than the others. CONCLUSION: Betafoam is effective in wound healing and provides the best performance amongst the various types of dressing materials in terms of re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and tissue invasion.
 
            