Status quo of enhanced recovery after surgery in different regional thoracic surgery in the mainland of China
10.7507/1007-4848.201708026
- VernacularTitle:加速康复外科在中国大陆各区域医院胸外科的应用现状分析
- Author:
ZHENG E
1
;
SHEN Cheng
1
;
WANG Wei
1
;
CHE Guowei
1
;
YANG Mei
1
;
GUO Chenglin
1
;
LIU Lunxu
1
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Enhanced recovery after surgery;
thoracic surgery;
region;
survey questionnaire
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2018;25(8):681-686
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the current status and difficulties of ERAS applicated in thoracic surgery in different regional hospitals. Methods A total of 773 valid questionnaires were collected during the First West China Forum on Chest ERAS and analyzed by geographical distribution. The content of the questionnaire was divided into two parts, including the respondents’ institute and personal information, as well as 10 questions about ERAS. Results There were 83.57%, 83.82%, 89.58%, 93.75%, 94.74% and 92.86% of surgeons and nurses in Sichuan province, municipalities, the eastern, western, southern and northern respectively who believed that ERAS in all surgeries should be used. There were 61.84%, 60.29%, 65.97%, 81.25%, 73.68% and 75.00% of surgeons and nurses who thought that the concept of ERAS was more in the theory than in the practice; 77.99%, 80.88%, 74.31%, 78.13%, 83.33%and 69.64% of respondents agreed that average hospital stay, patients’ experience and social satisfaction should be the evaluation standard of ERAS practice while 58.50%, 63.24%, 54.86%, 62.50%, 70.18% and 58.93% of respondents believed that immature procedure, lack of consensus and specifications and insecurity for doctors were the reasons for poor compliance of ERAS; 63.23%, 67.65%, 59.72%, 68.75%, 72.81% and 67.86% of respondents thought that the best team of ERAS should be based on the combination of subject integration, surgery orientation and surgeon-nurse teamwork; 43.73%, 44.12%, 43.75%, 46.88%, 59.65% and 41.07% of respondents thought that multidisciplinary cooperation, multi-modality conducted and surgical programming should be the best way for ERAS implementation; 72.98%, 69.12%, 62.50%, 65.63%, 80.70% and 55.36% of responders agreed that the ERAS forum or conference should include the norms and consensus, analysis and implementation of projects and the status and progress of ERAS. Conclusion There are more consistent views on the clinical application of ERAS in all regions. The subject integration, surgeon-nurse teamwork and multidisciplinary, multi-modality cooperation are the best team and best way for ERAS program implementation.
