Evaluation of the Self-Testing Blood Glucose Monitoring System GlucoDr.S According to ISO 15197:2013 Guidelines.
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Namhee KIM
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Bo Gyung KIM
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Sun Hee JUN
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Kyunghoon LEE
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Tae Jung OH
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Sung Hee CHOI
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Soo LIM
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Sang Hoon SONG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Woon Heung SONG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Junghan SONG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Hak Chul JANG
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
 - Publication Type:Original Article
 - Keywords: POCT; GlucoDr.S; Blood Glucose Monitoring System; ISO15197:2013
 - MeSH: Biological Science Disciplines; Blood Glucose*; Consensus; Glucose; Hematocrit; Humans; Xylose
 - From:Laboratory Medicine Online 2018;8(3):77-86
 - CountryRepublic of Korea
 - Language:Korean
 - Abstract: BACKGROUND: The performance of the self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with diabetes should be properly evaluated to ensure strict glycemic control. This study evaluated the self-testing Blood Glucose Monitoring System GlucoDr.S™ (All Medicus Co., Ltd., Korea). METHODS: This study recruited 120 patients. Use of the glucometer was evaluated according to ISO 15197:2013 guidelines. The YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose Analyzer (YSI Life Sciences, USA) was used as the reference device. RESULTS: The standard deviation and coefficients of variation ranges for measurement repeatability and intermediate measurement precision conducted with 10 meters and 3 reagent lots on the same day were 2.7–3.2 mg/dL (<100 mg/dL) and 3.4–3.7% (≥100 mg/dL), respectively, and 3.7 mg/dL (<100 mg/dL) and 2.1–2.6% (≥100 mg/dL), respectively. Each coefficient of determination (R2) for linearity of the 3 reagent lots was >0.99. The influence effect of hematocrit and the 24 interference agents was not significant, except for xylose. A system accuracy test was conducted with 100 subjects taking duplicate measurements from each of the 3 reagent lots. When glucose levels were <100 mg/dL and ≥100 mg/dL, >95% of the samples were within ±15 mg/dL and within ±15% of the average measured values of the reference measurement, respectively. In Consensus Error grid analysis, all results were distributed in zone A and B. The results of the user performance evaluation using 115 lay persons were also included in the acceptance range. CONCLUSION: The GlucoDr.S™ showed acceptable performance according to the ISO 15197:2013 guidelines and could be a clinically useful self-testing glucometer.
 
            