The Effect of Induction Chemotherapy Using Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil on Survival in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.
- Author:
Ryul KIM
1
;
Seokyung HAHN
;
Junghoon SHIN
;
Chan Young OCK
;
Miso KIM
;
Bhumsuk KEAM
;
Tae Min KIM
;
Dong Wan KIM
;
Dae Seog HEO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Meta-Analysis ; Original Article
- Keywords: Head and neck neoplasms; Induction chemotherapy; Chemoradiotherapy; Review; Meta-analysis
- MeSH: Arm; Bias (Epidemiology); Carcinoma, Squamous Cell*; Chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin*; Disease-Free Survival; Epithelial Cells*; Fluorouracil*; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Head*; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy*; Medical Oncology; Neck*; Neoplasm Metastasis
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment 2016;48(3):907-916
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the survival of patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone with that of patients undergoing induction chemotherapy (IC) using docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by CRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in April 2015 and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings (2008-2014) were reviewed. Summaries of the results were pooled using a fixed-effect model, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool. RESULTS: A total of six relevant trials comprising 1,280 patients were identified. There was no statistically significant overall survival (OS) advantage for TPF prior to CRT (TPF/CRT) over CRT alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.09; p=0.339). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the TPF/CRT arms (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.95; p=0.009). Patients with non-oropharyngeal LA-HNSCC obtained the greatest OS and PFS benefits from TPF (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.99; p=0.043 and HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; p=0.022, respectively). The complete response rate was significantly increased (risk ratio [RR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.56; p < 0.001), and the distant metastasis rate tended to decrease (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.04; p=0.071) in the TPF/CRT arms. CONCLUSION: IC with TPF followed by CRT is not superior to CRT alone for OS. However, PFS and the complete response rate were significantly improved in the TPF/CRT arms. TPF/CRT for patients with nonoropharyngeal LA-HNSCC provided clear survival advantages.
