Does Intramedullary Signal Intensity on MRI Affect the Surgical Outcomes of Patients with Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament?.
10.3340/jkns.2014.56.2.121
- Author:
Jae Hyuk CHOI
1
;
Jun Jae SHIN
;
Tae Hong KIM
;
Hyung Shik SHIN
;
Yong Soon HWANG
;
Sang Keun PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. zunzae@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament;
Spinal cord injury;
Surgical treatment;
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MeSH:
Asian Continental Ancestry Group;
Decompression;
Diabetes Mellitus;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*;
Orthopedics;
Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament*;
Spinal Cord;
Spinal Cord Diseases;
Spinal Cord Injuries;
Surgical Procedures, Minor
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
2014;56(2):121-129
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Patients with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are susceptible to cord injury, which often develops into myelopathic symptoms. However, little is known regarding the prognostic factors that are involved in minor trauma. We evaluated the relationship between minor trauma and neurological outcome of OPLL and investigated the prognostic factors with a focus on compressive factors and intramedullary signal intensity (SI). METHODS: A total of 74 patients with cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL at more than three-levels were treated with posterior decompression surgeries. We surveyed the space available for spinal cord (SAC), the severity of SI change on T2-weighted image, and diabetes mellitus (DM). The neurological outcome using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale was assessed at admission and at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Among the variables tested, preoperative JOA score, severity of intramedullary SI, SAC, and DM were significantly related to neurological outcome. The mean preoperative JOA were 11.3+/-1.9 for the 41 patients who did not have histories of trauma and 8.0+/-3.1 for the 33 patients who had suffered minor traumas (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the recovery ratios between those two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Initial neurological status and high intramedullary SI in the preoperative phase were related to poorer postoperative outcomes. Moreover, the patients with no histories of DM and larger SACs exhibited better improvement than did the patients with DM and smaller SACs. Although the initial JOA scores were worse for the minor trauma patients than did those who had no trauma prior to surgery, minor trauma exerted no direct effects on the surgical outcomes.
