The Usefulness of the mPTS (modified pediatric trauma score) and Newly Developed Extended mPTS as a High Risk Pediatric Trauma Patients Screening Tool: Support of Two Tiered Trauma Team Activation System.
- Author:
Moon Cheol KANG
1
;
Il Jae WANG
;
Suck Ju CHO
;
Seok Ran YEOM
;
Sang Kyoon HAN
;
Sung Wook PARK
;
Seong Hwa LEE
;
Soon Chang PARK
;
Dae Sup LEE
;
Hyun Min CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea. jrmr9933@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Wounds and injuries;
Triage;
Pediatrics;
Emergency medicine
- MeSH:
Abdominal Injuries;
Angiography;
Blood Pressure;
Busan;
Consciousness;
Emergencies;
Emergency Medicine;
Emergency Service, Hospital;
Humans;
Injury Severity Score;
Intensive Care Units;
Mass Screening*;
Pediatrics;
Physical Examination;
Retrospective Studies;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Thoracostomy;
Trauma Centers;
Triage;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2017;28(6):579-586
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: A secondary triage tool for pediatric trauma patients, “modified pediatric trauma score (mPTS)” was introduced to predict high risk trauma. METHODS: Pediatric trauma patients (≤15 years) presenting to the Pusan National University Hospital trauma center emergency department were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were classified into high risk and low risk groups. The high risk group was assigned an Injury Severity Score ≥12, death, intensive care unit admission, or urgent intervention (intubation, closed thoracostomy, emergency angiography and embolization, emergency surgery). The airway, blood pressure, fractures, level of consciousness, and external wounds were evaluated and the mPTS was calculated. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven patients were enrolled in this study. The mPTS had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 88%, 54%, 60%, and 85%, respectively. Overtriage and undertriage was 39% and 14%, respectively. The mPTS missed 6 high risk patients and all 6 patients were abdominal injury patients. The mPTS was modified to include an abdominal physical examination and/or focused assessment with sonography for trauma. The newly developed scoring system was called the extended mPTS (E-mPTS). The E-mPTS had a sensitivity of 98% and negative predictive value of 98%. The safe level of overtriage (38%) was maintained. CONCLUSION: mPTS was applied to the patients and the undertriage rate was too high. The extended mPTS improved undertriage to 2% while maintaining the overtriage rate at a safe level. The E-mPTS is expected to have a resource saving effect when used as a pediatric trauma team activation standard.
