Tanreqing Injection Versus Cibavirin for Children's Viral Pneumonia:Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
	    		
		   		
	    	
    	
    	
   		
        
        	
        		- VernacularTitle:2种用药方案治疗小儿病毒性肺炎的成本-效果分析
 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Pengfei XU
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Guangchen WEI
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Minyi SI
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Jun XING
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Chuanhai DONG
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		
		        		
	        		
        		 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Publication Type:Journal Article
 
        	
        	
        		- Keywords:
        			
	        			
	        				
	        				
			        		
				        		Children's viral pneumonia;
			        		
			        		
			        		
				        		Tanreqing injection;
			        		
			        		
			        		
				        		Ribavirin;
			        		
			        		
			        		
				        		Cost-effectiveness analysis
			        		
			        		
	        			
        			
        		
 
        	
            
            
            	- From:
	            		
	            			China Pharmacy
	            		
	            		 2005;0(23):-
	            	
            	
 
            
            
            	- CountryChina
 
            
            
            	- Language:Chinese
 
            
            
            	- 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Tanreqing injection in treating children's viral pneumonia.METHODS:In this retrospective study,sixty children with viral pneumonia were randomly assigned to receive Tanreqing Injection(treatment Group,n=30)or Ribavirin(control Group,n=30).The clinical effects and adverse drug reactions(ADRs)of the two groups were compared,and the cost-effectiveness analyses were performed.RESULTS:The effective rate was 100% in the treatment Group versus 80% in the control Group;the incidence rate of ADRs was 3.33% vs.13.33%;the cost was 297.88 vs.399.95 yuan;and the cost-effectiveness was 297.88 vs.499.94,all showing significant differences between the two groups(P