Improvement of EP9-A2 for bias estimation among multiple quantitative detection systems in full range of AMR
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	 
    	10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2014.11.045
   		
        
        	
        		- VernacularTitle:全线性范围内多个定量检测系统间的偏倚评估
 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Meng ZHAO
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Jingang LUO
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Xiaopeng LAN
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		
		        		
	        		
        		 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Publication Type:Journal Article
 
        	
        	
        		- Keywords:
        			
	        			
	        				
	        				
			        		
				        		measurement range;
			        		
			        		
			        		
				        		distance from deviation to tolerable error;
			        		
			        		
			        		
				        		bias;
			        		
			        		
			        		
				        		method comparison
			        		
			        		
	        			
        			
        		
 
        	
            
            
            	- From:
	            		
	            			International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
	            		
	            		 2014;(11):1478-1479
	            	
            	
 
            
            
            	- CountryChina
 
            
            
            	- Language:Chinese
 
            
            
            	- 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	Objective To improve EP9-A2 for Bias estimation among multiple quantitative detection systems within full range of AMR.Methods 40 patients specimens were determined twice for serum total cholesterol by four detection systems(A,B,C and D).With system A served as comparative method,Bias between A and the other three was evaluated according to CLSI EP9-A2 separately.Furthermore,DD(distance from deviation to tolerable error)and its average confidence intervals between every two sys-tem were calculated and compared with zero.The confidence interval of greater than zero was served as criteria for accepting bias between every two system.Results Bias between A and the other three meet the analytical quality specification according to EP9-A2,although that of D system was positive,and those of B and C system were negative.DD between every two system obeyed nor-mality distribution.All biases between every two system wes acceptable except that between B and D,causing of their interval con-taining zero.After correcting of results from system D,Biases between every two system were all acceptable.Plots of confidence in-terval could provide a full range bias assessment within AMR.Conclusion Comparability and Bias estimation in full range of AMR for results between every two system among 3 or more systems could be evaluated by confidence intervals.