Dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture of 90 cases
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2013.06.019
- VernacularTitle:动力髋螺钉、股骨近端锁定加压钢板以及防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折90例临床分析
- Author:
Gang LIU
;
Jinxing LIU
;
Zhongfa ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Dynamic hip screw;
Proximal femoral locking compression plate;
Anti-rotation intramedullary nail of proximal femur;
Intertrochanteric fracture
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2013;(6):622-625
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the treatment effects of senile intertrochanteric fracture with the dynamic hip screw(DHS),proximal femur locking compression plate (LCP),anti-spin femur proximal femoral nail(PFNA).Methods Ninety cases of femoral rotor fracture patients were treat in our hospital from September 2010 to March 2012 by DHS(n =30),LCP(n =30) and PFNA(n =30) treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.We compared the surgical time,blood loss,fracture healing time,postoperative complications and hip function scores.Results In DHS,LCP and PFNA group,the blood loss ((287.1 ± 72.0) ml,(214.9 ± 65.8)ml,(85.0 ± 33.6) ml,F =88.7,P ＜ 0.05),the operative time ((1.51 ± 0.07) h,(1.49 ± 0.04) h,(0.70 ±0.10) h,F =445.8,P ＜ 0.05),and both were significant difference.But the fracture healing time ((15.2 ±1.7) weeks,(17.0 ± 1.4) weeks,(15.9 ± 1.8) weeks,F =1.4,P ＞ 0.05),there was no significant difference.The PFNA group had a good hip Sander' score of 96.7％,better than other two groups (87.5％、96.8％) (x2 =39.06,P ＜0.05).The weight-beating time of PFNA group is earlier than the other two groups ((1.00±0.36) cm,(0.80±0.12) cm,(0.60±0.19) cm,F=30.4,P＜0.05).Conclusion PFNAinthe treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture has advantages in minimally invasive,less blood loss,and help patients go through the perioperative period.
