Comparison of three anti-aquaporin 4 antibody detection methods in neuromylitis optica

VernacularTitle:视神经脊髓炎特异性抗体三种检测方法比较
Author: Jing YE ; Zhangyuan LIAO ; Hui SUN ; Xiaofan YOU ; Xiaoli WU ; Cunjiang LI
Publication Type:Journal Article
Keywords: Neuromylitis optica; Aquaporin 4; Fluorescent antibody technique
From: Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine 2011;50(10):848-850
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate three methods of detecting anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibody in neuromylitis optica (NMO),including indirect immunofluorescence assay organization(IIF),cell immunofluorescence method (CBA) and ELISA.MethodsThe patients were divided into NMO group (n =29), multiple sclerosis (MS) group (n = 23),and healthy controls group (n = 50).IIF, CBA and ELISA were used in 3 groups to detect serum anti-AQP4 antibody.The sensitivity and specificity as well as the consistency of positive results were compared.ResultsIn the aspect of the sensitivity of the three antiAQP4 antibody to diagnosis NMO, CBA (72.4％) ＞ IIF (62.1％) ＞ ELISA (51.7％) ; in the aspect of specificity, CBA (100.0％) ＞ ELISA (98.6％) ＞ IIF (97.3％).Kappa testing and evaluation method showed that the three detection methods were all in good consistency, particular in CBA and ELISA (P ＜0.01).ConclusionsCBA method showed a highest specificity and sensitivity in all these three anti-AQP4 antibody detection methods.CBA and ELISA are in better consistency of positive results.