The shaping ability of manual ProTaper on mandibular second molars
	    		
		   		
	    	
    	
    	
   		
        
        	
        		- VernacularTitle:手用ProTaper成形下颌第二磨牙根管的实验研究
 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Li HE
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Bing FAN
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Tuqiang HU
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Zhuan BIAN
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		
		        		
	        		
        		 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Publication Type:Journal Article
 
        	
        	
        		- Keywords:
        			
	        			
	        				
	        				
			        		
				        		Mandibular second molar;
			        		
			        		
			        		
				        		C-shaped root canal;
			        		
			        		
			        		
				        		Manual ProTaper
			        		
			        		
	        			
        			
        		
 
        	
            
            
            	- From:
	            		
	            			Journal of Practical Stomatology
	            		
	            		 2010;26(1):117-119
	            	
            	
 
            
            
            	- CountryChina
 
            
            
            	- Language:Chinese
 
            
            
            	- 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	Investigate the cleaning ability of manual ProTaper on mandibular second molars with C-shaped (c-shaped root) or normal root canal(separated root). Twenty mandibular second molars with C-shaped root or with separated roots were sectioned at 3.0, 5.5 and 8.0 mm from the root apex. The images of pre-preparation and F1, F2, and F3-prepapared of manual ProTaper were captured respectively. The cross-sectional areas of the canals were measured and the formula of area after treatment/area before treatment was used to calculate the area ratio. The data were analyzed by SPSS 10.0. The results showed that there was no statistically difference between cross-section root canal area ratios in two groups. Significant differences were found between the cross-section canal area ratio of F1 and F2, F1 and F3 at section 5 mm of S group, and F1 and F3 at section 3 mm of C group. The results suggested that the increasing of cross-section ratio of the two kinds of canals was not obviously concerned with their anatomical morphology.