The quality of ultrasonic root-end preparation: A quantitative study
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	 
    	10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2010.01.019
   		
        
        	
        		- VernacularTitle:超声波根尖倒预备的定量研究
 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Pingjuan ZHANG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Wenxia CHEN
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Qixin ZENG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Fangfang XIE
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		
		        		
	        		
        		 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Publication Type:Journal Article
 
        	
        	
        		- Keywords:
        			
	        			
	        				
	        				
			        		
				        		Ultrasonic instruments;
			        		
			        		
			        		
				        		Apicoectomy;
			        		
			        		
			        		
				        		Retropreparation
			        		
			        		
	        			
        			
        		
 
        	
            
            
            	- From:
	            		
	            			Journal of Practical Stomatology
	            		
	            		 2010;26(1):83-86
	            	
            	
 
            
            
            	- CountryChina
 
            
            
            	- Language:Chinese
 
            
            
            	- 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	Objective:To compare the quality of root-end preparation quantitatively between ultrasonic retrotips and traditional slow-speed handpiece. Methods: 27 maxillary second bicuspid teeth with two canals and an isthmus were randomly assigned to 3 groups.Root-end preparations were made respectively using ultrasonic diamond tip Berutti and niti tip RE2, ultrasonic 40~#K file and slow-speed handpiece with No.2 round bur. Image processing and analysis system were used to measure the preoperation and postoperation parameters for further evaluating the difference between the two techniques. Results: The cutting volume of ultrasonic instruments was less than slow-speed handpiece(P<0.000 1). Conclusion: Ultrasonic instrument is better in the root-end preparation than traditional slow-speed handpiece.