Long Term Clinical Follow Up of the Ionescu-Shiley Pericardial Xenograft in Mitral Position.
	    		
	    			
	    			
		        		
			        		
		        		
			        
		   		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	 
    	10.4326/jjcvs.25.235
   		
        
        	
        		- VernacularTitle:僧帽弁位に用いたIonescu-Shiley弁の長期遠隔成績
 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Yoshimasa Sakamoto
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Hiromi Kurosawa
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Masamichi Nakano
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Kazuhiko Suzuki
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Hiromitsu Takakura
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		
		        		
	        		
        		 
        	
        	
        	
        		- Publication Type:Journal Article
 
        	
        	
        		- Keywords:
        			
	        			
	        				
	        				
			        		
				        		Ionescu-Shiley Pericardial Xenograft
			        		
			        		
	        			
        			
        		
 
        	
            
            
            	- From:Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
	            		
	            		 1996;25(4):235-239
	            	
            	
 
            
            
            	- CountryJapan
 
            
            
            	- Language:Japanese
 
            
            
            	- 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts implanted in the mitral position between April 1980 and October 1984 were studied. In some cases the cusp was torn in a relatively early postoperative phase, thus requiring an emergency operation. Functional disorders, such as caused by the calcification of the cusp, advance at a relatively moderate pace, and the prognosis of a second operation in cases with valve dysfunction and a chronic course was favorable. The actuarial probability of freedom from reoperation was 88.5±8.7% at 5 years and 55.7±14.5% at 10 years. The structural deterioration of the pericardial valve increased about 5 years after replacement. This tendency was the same as in other bioprostheses. At 10 years the overall actuarial survival rate was 67.2±12.1%. Freedom at 10 years from thromboembolism was 84.6±9.8%. For cases whose the course is under observation at present, the strategy is to recommend an additional operation as far as possible, while continuously observing the function of the valve.