Comparison of the effect of palonosetron versus tropisetron in prevention of vomiting in patients receiving high dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	- VernacularTitle:盐酸帕洛诺司琼与托烷司琼预防含大剂量顺铂方案化疗所致呕吐的疗效
 - Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Rui-chao LI
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Li-jun ZHENG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Hong QIU
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
 - Publication Type:Journal Article
 - MeSH: Aged; Antiemetics; therapeutic use; Antineoplastic Agents; administration & dosage; adverse effects; therapeutic use; Cisplatin; administration & dosage; adverse effects; therapeutic use; Eating; drug effects; Female; Humans; Indoles; therapeutic use; Isoquinolines; therapeutic use; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; drug therapy; Quinuclidines; therapeutic use; Vomiting; chemically induced; prevention & control
 - From: Chinese Journal of Oncology 2012;34(3):228-231
 - CountryChina
 - Language:Chinese
 - 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of palonosetron for prevention of vomiting induced by high dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
METHODSOne-hundred and twenty-eight patients received tropisetron 5 mg plus dexamethasone 10 mg at the first cycle or palonosetron 0.25 mg plus dexamethasone 10 mg, respectively, each administered 30 min before the initiation of high dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy. To observe the remission rate of acute emetic episodes and delayed emetic episodes, adverse effects and daily food-intake in the patients after the chemotherapy.
RESULTSThe complete response (CR) rates for acute vomiting were not significantly different between the tropisetron and palonosetron cycles (75.8% vs. 79.7%, P>0.05). The complete control rate of delayed vomiting in the palonosetron cycle was significantly higher than that in the tropisetron cycle (70.3% vs. 50.8%, P<0.01). The food-intake decrease rate of palonosetron cycle was 18.8%, significantly lower than the 53.1% of the tropisetron cycle (P<0.05). The toxicity in the two cycles was similar and no grade 3-4 toxicity was observed.
CONCLUSIONSPalonosetron is superior to tropisetron with a lower remission rate of delayed emesis induced by high dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy and with tolerable toxicity. Moreover, the apparent emesis control of palonosetron treatment seems to provide an adequate food-intake in these patients.
 
            