An experimental study on rabbit's radial bone defect healed by application of mimetic periosteum with tissue-engineered bone.
- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Hong-Gang GUO
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Fang-Lian YAO
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Xin-Long MA
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Kang-De YAO
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
 - Publication Type:Journal Article
 - MeSH: Animals; Biocompatible Materials; Bone Regeneration; Bone Substitutes; Male; Periosteum; Rabbits; Radius; pathology; surgery; Tissue Engineering; methods
 - From: Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery 2008;24(1):63-67
 - CountryChina
 - Language:Chinese
 - 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	
OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study is to investigate the osteogenic potential and possibility of combination application of mimetic osteoinductive periosteum with tissue-engineered bone.
METHODSThe three-dimensional construction of tissue-engineered bone was made by implantation of adipose derived stromal cells (ADSCs) into rhBMP-2 mediated bio-derived carrier, and mimetic periosteum was constructed by loading ADSCs into Cs-Col-beta3-TCP with rhBMP-2. 10 mm defects of right radiuses were established in adult New Zealand rabbits, group A was transplanted by tissue-engineered bone with mimetic periosteum, group B was implanted by tissue-engineered bone, and group C was implanted by mimetic periosteum, group D was transplanted by bio-derived compound bone as blank scaffold. X-ray, histology, immunohistochemistry stain, dural energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) examinations were performed at different periods.
RESULTSGroup A played a predominant role in process of new tissue regeneration and mature bone reconstitution, defect completely healed at 12 weeks. Group B showed primary repair, group C also existed in modeling stage. While, group D displayed retard regeneration with poor osteogenic capacity. DEXA result showed that group A had statistical significance over control group according to data of BMC and BMD ( P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONSEnhanced osteogenic potential can be obtained by using tissue-engineered bone with mimetic osteoinductive periosteum. Defect can be healed with concord pattern of osteoinductive and osteopromotive and osteoconductive effects.
 
            