Discrimination of metastatic from non-metastatic mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
10.1007/s11596-016-1631-6
- Author:
Xiao-Ping YU
1
,
2
;
Lu WEN
3
;
Jing HOU
3
;
Hui WANG
4
;
Qiang LU
3
Author Information
1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hunan Cancer Hospital & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China. nj9015@
2. com.
3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hunan Cancer Hospital & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
4. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging;
lymph node;
quantitative analysis;
rectal cancer;
sensitivity and specificity
- MeSH:
Contrast Media;
therapeutic use;
Diagnosis, Differential;
Female;
Humans;
Lymph Nodes;
diagnostic imaging;
pathology;
Lymphatic Metastasis;
diagnosis;
diagnostic imaging;
pathology;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Male;
Rectal Neoplasms;
diagnosis;
diagnostic imaging;
pathology
- From:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences)
2016;36(4):594-600
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Preoperative detection of lymph nodes (LNs) metastasis is always highly challenging for radiologists nowadays. The utility of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (QDCE-MRI) in identifying LNs metastasis is not well understood. In the present study, 59 patients with histologically proven rectal carcinoma underwent preoperative QDCE-MRI. The short axis diameter ratio, long axis diameter ratio, short-to-long axis diameter ratio and QDEC-MRI parameters (K(trans), Kep, fPV and Ve) values were compared between the non-metastatic (n=44) and metastatic (n=35) LNs groups based on pathological examination. Compared with the non-metastatic group, the metastatic group exhibited significantly higher short axis diameter (7.558±0.668 mm vs. 5.427±0.285 mm), K(trans) (0.483±0.198 min(-1) vs. 0.218±0.116 min(-1)) and Ve (0.399±0.118 vs. 0.203±0.096) values (all P<0.05). The short-to-long axis diameter ratio, long axis diameter ratio, Kep and fPV values did not show significant differences between the two groups. In conclusion, our results showed that for LNs larger than 5 mm in rectal cancer, there are distinctive differences in the K(trans) and Ve values between the metastatic and non-metastatic LNs, suggesting that QDCE-MRI may be potentially helpful in identifying LNs status.
