The Reliability of the Transconjunctival Approach for Orbital Exposure: Measurement of Positional Changes in the Lower Eyelid.
10.7181/acfs.2017.18.4.249
- Author:
Sung Ho YOON
1
;
Jin Hoon LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. y34805@korea.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Blow-out fracture;
Conjunctiva;
Ectropion
- MeSH:
Cicatrix;
Conjunctiva;
Ectropion;
Entropion;
Eyelids*;
Follow-Up Studies;
Hand;
Hematoma;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Methods;
Orbit*;
Orbital Fractures;
Plastics;
Reflex;
Surgeons
- From:Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
2017;18(4):249-254
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Lower eyelid incisions are widely used for the orbital approach in periorbital trauma and aesthetic surgery. In general, the subciliary approach is known to cause disposition of the lower eyelid by scarring the anterior lamella in some cases. On the other hand, many surgeons believe that a transconjunctival approach usually does not result in such complications and is a reliable method. We measured positional changes in the lower eyelid in blowout fracture repair since entropion is one of the most serious complications of the transconjunctival orbital approach. METHODS: To measure the positional changes in the lower eyelids, we analyzed preoperative and postoperative photographs over various time intervals. In the analysis of the photographs, marginal reflex distance 2 (MRD2) and eyelash angle were used as an index of eyelid position. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the significance in the positional changes. All patients underwent orbital reconstruction through a transconjunctival incision by a single plastic surgeon. RESULTS: In 42 blowout fracture patients, there was no statistical significant difference in the MRD2 and eyelash angle. Furthermore, there were no clinical complications, such as infection, hematoma, bleeding, or implant protrusion, during the follow-up periods. CONCLUSION: The advantages of the transconjunctival approach for orbital access include minimal scarring and a lower risk of eyelid displacement compared with other approaches. Based on these results, we recommend the transconjunctival approach for orbital exposure as a safe and reliable method.
