Reliability and Validity of the Short Form of the Literacy-Independent Cognitive Assessment in the Elderly.
	    		
		   		
		   			
		   		
	    	
    	- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Jungeun KIM
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Jee H JEONG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Seol Heui HAN
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Hui Jin RYU
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Jun Young LEE
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Seung Ho RYU
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Dong Woo LEE
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Yong S SHIM
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Seong Hye CHOI
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		
			        		Author Information
			        		
 - Publication Type:Original Article
 - Keywords: illiteracy; dementia; sensitivity; specificity
 - MeSH: Aged; Dementia; Literacy; Humans; Neuropsychological Tests; Reproducibility of Results; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity
 - From:Journal of Clinical Neurology 2013;9(2):111-117
 - CountryRepublic of Korea
 - Language:English
 - Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Literacy-Independent Cognitive Assessment (LICA) has been developed for a diagnosis of dementia and is a useful neuropsychological test battery for illiterate populations as well as literate populations. The objective of this study was to develop the short form of the LICA (S-LICA) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the S-LICA. METHODS: The subtests of the S-LICA were selected based on the factor analysis and validation study results of the LICA. Patients with dementia (n=101) and normal elderly controls (n=185) participated in this study. RESULTS: Cronbach's coefficient alpha of the S-LICA was 0.92 for illiterate subjects and 0.94 for literate subjects, and the item-total correlation ranged from 0.63 to 0.81 (p<.01).The test-retest reliability of the S-LICA total score was high (r=0.94, p<.001), and the subtests had high test-retest reliabilities (r=0.68-0.87, p<.01). The correlation between the K-MMSE and S-LICA total scores were substantial in both the illiterate subjects (r=0.837, p<.001) and the literate subjects(r=0.802, p<.001). The correlation between the S-LICA and LICA was very high (r=0.989, p<.001). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.999 for the literate subjects and 0.985 for the illiterate subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the S-LICA for a diagnosis of dementia were 97% and 96% at the cutoff point of 72 for the literate subjects, and 96% and 93% at the cutoff point of 68 for the illiterate subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the S-LICA is a reliable and valid instrument for quick evaluation of patients with dementia in both illiterate and literate elderly populations.
 
            