Intensive Individualized Reinforcement Education Is Important for the Prevention of Hypoglycemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
10.4093/dmj.2015.39.2.154
- Author:
Yun Mi YONG
1
;
Kyung Mi SHIN
;
Kang Min LEE
;
Jae Young CHO
;
Sun Hye KO
;
Min Hyang YOON
;
Tae Won KIM
;
Jong Hyun JEONG
;
Yong Moon PARK
;
Seung Hyun KO
;
Yu Bae AHN
Author Information
1. Diabetes Care Team, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea. ybahn@catholic.ac.kr, kosh@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Diabetes mellitus, type 2;
Diabetes education;
Hypoglycemia
- MeSH:
Blood Glucose;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;
Education*;
Follow-Up Studies;
Food Habits;
Humans;
Hypoglycemia*;
Insulin;
Life Style;
Male
- From:Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
2015;39(2):154-163
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether an intensive individualized reinforcement education program could influence the prevention of hypoglycemic events in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: From March 2013 to September 2013, patients aged 35 to 75 years with type 2 diabetes who had not previously participated in diabetes education, and treated with insulin or a sulfonylurea-containing regimen were included in the study. After structured group education, the patients assigned to the intensive individualized education group (IT) were requested to visit for reinforcement. All subjects in the IT were encouraged to self-manage dose adjustments. Participants in both groups (control group [CG, group education only; n=22] and IT [n=24]) attended follow-up visits at 2, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. At each visit, all patients were asked whether they had experienced hypoglycemia. RESULTS: The total study population consisted of 20 men (43.5%; mean age and diabetic duration of 55.9+/-11.0 and 5.1+/-7.3 years, respectively). At 24 weeks, there were no significant differences in hemoglobin A1c values between the CG and IT. The total number of hypoglycemic events per patient was 5.26+/-6.5 in the CG and 2.58+/-2.3 times in the IT (P=0.004). Adherence to lifestyle modification including frequency of exercise, self-monitoring of blood glucose, or dietary habit was not significantly different between the groups. However, adherence to hypoglycemia management, especially the dose adjustment of medication, was significantly higher in the IT compared with the CG. CONCLUSION: Compared with the structured group education, additional IT resulted in additional benefits in terms of avoidance of hypoglycemia and treating hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.
