Efficiency comparison of different predictive models in the screening of anisometropia in children and adolescents
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2025.11.23
- VernacularTitle:不同预测模型对儿童青少年屈光参差筛查的效能比较
- Author:
Wei WANG
1
;
Shengyu OU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Optometry, Beihai Second People's Hospital, Beihai 536000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
anisometropia;
children and adolescents;
prediction model;
sensitivity;
specificity
- From:
International Eye Science
2025;25(11):1859-1863
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
AIM: To compare the diagnostic efficiency of binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity(UCDVA), pre-cycloplegia refraction spherical equivalent(PR-SE), axial length(AL)difference, and their different combinations in the screening of anisometropia in children and adolescents, and to evaluate the practical value of different indicator combinations in simplifying the screening process when taking cycloplegic retinoscopy results as the gold standard for diagnosing anisometropia.METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A total of 500 consecutive cases of children and adolescents aged 6-18 years with known refractive status were included. Taking cycloplegic retinoscopy results as the gold standard for anisometropia diagnosis, the binocular UCDVA, PR-SE, and AL difference were incorporated into ROC curve analysis to assess the diagnostic efficacy of each indicator. Furthermore, predictive models were constructed and reliability analysis was performed.RESULTS: The average age of the included cases was 10.75±2.24 years, including 239 males and 261 females. The AUC of the interocular PR-SE difference(0.972, 95%CI: 0.960-0.984)was significantly higher than that of other indicators. The Youden index was the largest when the bincular UCDVA difference was 0.25, the PR-SE difference was 0.743, and the AL difference was 0.31. When the interocular PR-SE difference used 0.743 and 1.00 D as screening cutoffs, the former had a higher AUC(AUC=0.924, 95%CI: 0.895-0.953). Comparison of different constructed predictive models showed that when the binocular PR-SE difference was ≥0.743 D, the negative predictive value reached 98.89%, making it suitable for initial screening. The combination of UCDVA+PR-SE+AL had the highest specificity and positive predictive value, while the PR-SE+AL combination had the highest consistency rate.CONCLUSION: The binocular PR-SE difference is the best choice for single-indicator screening. Combining UCDVA and AL can increase the specificity to 98.00% and the positive predictive value to 88.24%. The PR-SE+AL combination can achieve the highest consistency rate.
