Protective value of radiation protection safety education for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma treated with iodine-131
10.20001/j.issn.2095-2619.20250613
- VernacularTitle:辐射防护安全教育对分化型甲状腺癌患者碘-131治疗的防护价值
- Author:
Wen WANG
1
;
Aomei ZHAO
;
Hongmei LIANG
;
Jie BAI
;
Qi WANG
;
Yiqian LIANG
;
Jianjun XUE
Author Information
1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Radiation protection;
Safety education;
Differentiated thyroid cancer;
Iodine-131 treatment;
Dose equivalent rate
- From:
China Occupational Medicine
2025;52(3):313-317
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the protective effect of radiation protection safety education (RPSE) on patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) undergoing iodine-131 (131I) treatment. Methods The DTC patients who undergo 131I treatment were divided into the control group and the RPSE group using the convenience sampling method, with 142 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received routine health education, while the RPSE group received routine health education combined with RPSE. Dose equivalent rate (DER) on pillows, bed sheets, quilt covers, and household waste of patients were compared between the two groups upon discharge. Results The median (M) DERs of patients' pillows, bed sheets, quilt covers and household waste were 3.86, 3.63, 3.91 and 56.59 times higher in the control group compared with the environmental background level, respectively. The M DERs of patients' pillows, bed sheets, quilt covers were 2.23, 2.18, and 2.55 times higher in the RPSE group compared with the environmental background level, while the M DER of household waste was equivalent to the environmental background level. The DERs of patients' pillows, bed sheets, quilt covers, and household waste in the RPSE group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.001). The DERs of the above four items were lower in both male and female patients in RPSE group compared with same-gender patients in the control group (all P<0.001). The patients' DERs of the above indicators had no significant difference among different gender in both control group and RPSE group (all P>0.05), except for higher DER of household waste in female patients than that of male patients in the control group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the DERs of pillows, bed sheets, quilt covers, and household waste across subgroups, where patients received different treatment doses, of both the control group and the RPSE group (all P>0.05). Conclusion RPSE for DTC patients treated with 131I, reduces the DERs of pillows, bed sheets, quilt covers, and particularly household waste.